Ken McClure’s View of the World in 2011
There probably never was a time when humanity did not face some kind of a threat to its existence, be it from the forces of nature in terms of earthquake or hurricane, volcanic eruption or tsunami or through challenge from the microbial world in the form of epidemics which have periodically swept the globe since the dawn of time; smallpox in ancient Egypt, bubonic plague in fourteenth century Europe, worldwide pandemic flu in the early twentieth century. But through it all we survived. We prevailed because we had the power of reason and the opposition didn’t. We triumphed because we developed the science which enabled us to plan, predict and avoid conflict with the overwhelming power of natural phenomena and to develop and design drugs to combat disease or immunise ourselves against threats for which we had no drugs through vaccination.
Despite this enduring scientific success story, the public have little regard for science and little understanding of it, a strange, almost bizarre situation which demands consideration. Put simply, the public are much more comfortable with the arts than they are with science and place more importance on them in everyday life. It is perfectly acceptable to remain completely ignorant of all things scientific in a way that would not be tolerated for anything to do with the arts. No one thinks any the worse of the person who throws up their hands and pleads, ‘Don’t blind me with science,’ at the mere mention of DNA whereas anyone daring to come out with, ‘Who exactly is Beethoven?’ would be subject to a very different social judgement.
It used to be said that the devil got all the best tunes but, in the battle between arts and science, the arts not only get …
